Philosophy of Law

The current situation reflects a system for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in the U.S. that is far from uniform or predictable. In general, it is almost impossible to anticipate the procedural or substantive principles that would be applicable to a particular foreign judgment. It is not until the party seeking the enforcement chooses a forum in the U.S. that the particular state law might give a sense of how the case, could be resolved by the state court, or the federal court applying state law. Nevertheless, for any foreign lawyer seeking answers regarding the enforceability of the judgment in the U.S. would definitely find the discussion difficult. It would require consultation with more than one American lawyer, a review of state law, and an analysis of any legislation at the local level before there could be a sensible response on the status that the foreign judgment could have in the U.S.

Sovereign states, no matter how strenuously they cling to the Westphalian paradigm, assert their right to regulate persons, property or events in their domestic jurisdictional boundaries, and attempt to enforce these regulations, encounter transboundary interactions that introduce foreign law, judgments, and status into their domestic legal orders. One aspect of the interaction between legal systems is the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements and the role of the European Court of Human Rights in the process.

Employers can be said to now be in a position of sovereignty, to have, in part, taken over where the community once decided on the right of residency. It is now employers who vet prospective citizens, their qualifications and desirability as future members, while applications for membership are, in the last instance, approved by the state. This is a novel development in citizenship practice in the US landscape. A new full, revised version as an additional analysis for the study of the history of the philosophy of law.

Historically, the legal profession in Asian countries, and in particular in China, has expanded within the decade following a rapid social transition and the government campaign of rule by law. Despite the rapid development of Chinese law, which has changed the appearance and role of the Chinese legal profession, the foundation of the legal profession is not as solid as western countries. Unlike western countries, legal professionalization in China is in its nascent stage. How to understand the meaning of the legal profession and lawyering is a learning process for scholars. A new full, revised version as an additional analysis for the study of the history of the philosophy of law.

This book explores how the legality of torture law within the historical context of last-survived official practices, has been evolved over time, during the second half of the nineteenth and early twentieth century.

The exercise of legislative review over colonial statutes by metropolitan committees and councils was a policy that colonists at times resisted and contested but in large part acquiesced to. As scholars of the early Empires have shown, the empire was not, and could not, be held together by force. Insurmountable logistical hurdles imposed by distance and financial constraints, coupled with a general reluctance on the part of imperial authorities to commit the necessary resources, all but ensured the need for a significant level of colonial participation and consent in imperial policies. These forces have finally shaped the way for the modern perspectives of legal theory and practices in Western world.

Discussions of non-formal justice have tended to be seen in terms of opposition between formal" or state justice on the one hand, and informal or popular justice on the other. Models or constructs of state justice are depicted as rule-based institutions, associated with central or state government and dependent on experts with technical legal training. This model is seen as operating on the basis of sanctions or coercion, emphasizing competition and adversarial proceedings whose results are zero-sum, with winners and losers. By contrast, popular justice is seen as having characteristics oppositional to those of state justice, such as informal procedures, non-bureaucratization, conciliatory and consensual decisional making processes. A new full, revised version as an additional analysis for the study of the history of the philosophy of law.